1 credit

Six-Second Scan

A first pass over a resume is short. This shows you exactly what is inside that window on yours - and which of your strongest facts are not, so you can move them up.

  • 1 credit per run
  • 20 free credits at signup
  • One free run every day
Free to start

20 credits when you sign up - 20 resume scans

Nothing to install and no subscription. A verified account starts with 20 credits, five more for completing your profile, and re-running an identical input costs nothing at all - we recognise it and charge you nothing.

Scan my resumeOr try a free tool, no signup

The run needs an account because it spends credits, and the credits are what pay for the AI call. The keyword extractor beside it needs no account and never will - it makes no external call, so it costs us nothing to run.

credit a run
1
runs on the signup grant
20
strong facts it looks for
4
scores - it reports a position
0
What a run needs

Just the resume - there is no form to fill in

Everything this tool needs is already in the file. It reads the document in reading order and reports a position, not a grade.

What you give it

  1. Your resume - uploaded, or the one already on your profile.
  2. Nothing else. There is no form to fill in.
1 credita run

New accounts start with 20 credits and five more for completing a profile, so your first runs are covered. Re-running the same input is free - we recognise it and charge nothing.

I agree that the text I have entered is sent, with names and contact details removed, to an AI model hosted outside India, to generate this result.

The attribution

Where the six seconds comes from, and what we do not claim

The six-second figure comes from published recruiter eye-tracking research by The Ladders. It is not something Revquix has measured, and we do not do eye tracking. We use it the way the industry does - as a rule of thumb for how long a first pass takes.

What this tool actually does is deterministic and checkable: it takes the part of page one a reader reaches first in reading order, and tells you which of your strongest facts are not in it. Your years of experience, your core stack, your best number, your seniority. If any of those is on page two, it is not in the first pass.

On a two-column resume it refuses to answer rather than guessing, because reading order interleaves the columns and every finding derived from that would be wrong. That is also the layout most applicant tracking systems mis-read, which is worth knowing on its own.

Sample output · invented data

A whole scan, before you spend a credit

Example output on invented data. Nothing here is a real resume, person or company. Everything inside the window is the component the dashboard renders - not a screenshot, and not a trimmed version of it.

Your first twelve lines are a title, a generic summary and a skills list - none of which separates you from anyone else applying. The strongest fact on your resume, a four-hour batch cut to forty minutes, is on page two.

What a reader sees first

12 lines · 439 of 4120 characters · 11% of the document

[CANDIDATE]
[EMAIL] · [PHONE] · Bengaluru

Senior Backend Engineer

SUMMARY
Backend engineer working on payment infrastructure. Interested in distributed systems and
building reliable services at scale. Looking for a role with more ownership.

SKILLS
Java, Spring Boot, Kafka, PostgreSQL, Kubernetes, Redis, Docker, AWS

Strong facts that are not in it

3 signals

  • Years of experience

    6 years

    How long you have been doing this is the first thing a screener looks for, and it is the cheapest thing to state. If it is only derivable by adding up your date ranges, it is not in the first pass.

  • Core tech stack

    Java · Kafka · Spring Boot

    A skills list inside the zone is a claim; the same stack named inside a bullet is evidence. When the evidence is below the fold, the reader only sees the claim.

  • Quantified result

    Cut settlement batch time from 4 hours to 40 minutes using Kafka and Java

    Your strongest number is what makes you memorable in a stack of thirty. If a reader has to reach page two to find it, most will not.

What to move up

  • Six years of experience, stated as a number rather than left to be added up from dates
  • The settlement result, in the summary rather than three roles down
  • Kafka and Java demonstrated inside a bullet, not only listed under Skills

The line doing the least work

“Backend engineer working on payment infrastructure. Interested in distributed systems and building reliable services at scale.”

The six-second figure comes from published recruiter eye-tracking studies by The Ladders, not from anything Revquix has measured. We use it as the industry's own rule of thumb for how long a first pass takes.

There is no score, and there is no eye-tracking either. This shows you which of your strongest facts are outside the part of page one a reader reaches first - that is a position, not a grade.

End of the sample report. Everything below this line is the page's own copy - what we do with your text, and the questions people ask before pasting one in.

Scan mine

Not ready for an account? Extract keywords from a job description is free forever and needs no signup - it makes no external call, so it costs us nothing to run.

Try it free

What happens to your data

Your text is redacted before it reaches any AI model: name, email, phone, address and date of birth are replaced with tokens first. The model reads your document and writes the explanations; it never chooses a number - every score is arithmetic over a fixed rubric in our own code. One input to that arithmetic is the model's reading of which skills you evidence, so we store your result and re-running the same input returns it rather than a fresh one. We never invent a figure your own material does not contain.

Credits are a licence to use these tools - not money, not transferable. Full detail in our privacy policy and AI policy.

How this works

About Six-Second Scan

What it checks, what it deliberately does not, and how to read the output.

Where the six seconds comes from

The figure comes from published recruiter eye-tracking research by The Ladders. It is not something Revquix has measured, and we do not do eye tracking - we use it the way the industry does, as a rule of thumb for how long a first pass takes.

What this tool actually does is deterministic and checkable, which matters more than the number. It takes the part of page one a reader reaches first in reading order, and reports which of four specific signals are not in it: how long you have been doing this, your core stack, your strongest measurable result, and your seniority.

Why position beats content here

Almost every resume we see has the good material on it somewhere. The problem is rarely that a candidate has nothing to say; it is that the best fact is in the third bullet of the second role, and the top of page one is a title, a generic summary and a list of skills - which is what everybody else's top of page one also is.

A skills list inside the first pass is a claim. The same technology named inside a bullet with an outcome attached is evidence. When the evidence is below the fold, a fast reader only ever sees the claim, and claims do not differentiate.

On a two-column resume it refuses to answer

Reading order across two columns interleaves them, so the "first twelve lines" of a two-column document is a sentence from each side of the page in alternation. Every finding derived from that would be wrong, so the tool declines and tells you why rather than producing a confident answer from a broken premise.

That refusal is useful information on its own. A two-column layout is also the layout most applicant tracking systems mis-read, which is worth knowing before you send it anywhere. The ATS Resume Checker is free and will tell you what else that layout is doing.

What this tool will not do

It will not give you a score. There is no number out of a hundred here, because the finding is a position rather than a grade - a fact is either inside the first pass or it is not, and averaging that into a score would invent a precision it does not have.

It will not claim to track anybody's eyes. We compute reading order from your document; we do not observe readers.

It will not rewrite your resume. It tells you which facts to move up and which line is doing the least work. Moving them is a five-minute edit, and it is yours to make.

FAQ

Questions people actually ask

The ones that come up before somebody uploads anything.

Do recruiters really only spend six seconds?

That figure comes from published eye-tracking studies by The Ladders, not from anything Revquix has measured, and we cite it as the industry's own rule of thumb rather than as a fact about your applications. The useful part does not depend on the exact number: whatever the duration of a first pass, it is short enough that a fact on page two is not in it.

Is this an eye-tracking tool?

No. We do not observe readers and we make no claim to. What the tool computes is the part of page one that comes first in your document's own reading order, which is deterministic and checkable - you can see the extracted text in the report and confirm it is your resume's opening. The six-second framing is context for why that region matters.

Why does it refuse on my two-column resume?

Because reading order across two columns interleaves them, so the first twelve lines of the extracted text would be alternating fragments from both sides of the page, and every finding derived from that would be wrong. Rather than produce a confident answer from a broken premise, the tool says it cannot read the layout reliably. Nothing is charged for that run, and it is worth knowing separately - a two-column layout is also the one most applicant tracking systems mis-read.

Why is there no score?

Because the finding is a position rather than a quality. Your years of experience are either inside the first pass or they are not; there is no meaningful way to be 63% inside it. Rolling four binary observations into a number out of a hundred would look more rigorous and tell you less. If you want a scored, weighted view of the whole document, that is what the Resume Analyser is for.

What counts as a strong fact?

Four things, and the tool checks each of them independently: how many years you have been doing this stated as a number rather than left to be added up from dates, your core technology stack, your strongest quantified result, and your seniority. Each one that is missing from the first pass comes with a short explanation of why it matters there specifically.

Next, try one of these

More from Resume & Profile, or browse the full catalogue.

2 credits

AI Resume Analyser

Readiness Score out of 100, every deduction explained

ResumeOpen
Free

ATS Resume Checker

See exactly what a parser reads from your file

ResumeOpen
3 credits

JD ↔ Resume Match

Tailor your resume to one specific job description

ResumeOpen
Paid serviceResume Review from ₹299Read nextGuides on resumes, interviews and offers
When a tool is not enough

Get a human to rebuild it

Every automated check has a ceiling: it can tell you a bullet has no number in it, but it cannot decide which of your projects is worth two lines and which is worth six. A Revquix resume review is written by a person who hires for your target role.

Resume Review from ₹299