# Recruiter Outreach Message > One LinkedIn note, referral request or intro email for one role, from your real evidence. The recipient's name never reaches our AI provider. No bulk mode. Source: https://www.revquix.com/tools/recruiter-outreach-dm Cost: 1 credit a run, needs an account --- One message to one person, built around a specific role and something you have actually done. LinkedIn notes are held to the platform's 300-character limit, and the recipient's name never leaves our servers. ## Three channels, because they are three different messages A LinkedIn connection note has a hard 300-character limit set by LinkedIn, so it has room for one specific fact and an ask. A referral request goes to somebody who already works there and has to ask without assuming they owe you anything. An intro email needs a subject line, because an email without one does not get opened. Nothing is pre-selected. Guessing on your behalf would quietly hand you a 300-character note when you meant to send an email, and the draft is not interchangeable between the three. ## The recipient's name never reaches the AI provider If you tell us who you are writing to, that name is not in the request we send onward. The prompt carries a [RECIPIENT] token, and the real name is substituted back in on our own infrastructure once the draft returns. This matters because of what a cold message is. The person you are writing to is a named third party who has not agreed to anything being sent to a model outside India. Redacting your own contact details and then forwarding theirs would be a strange sort of privacy, so we do not. ## One recipient, and no bulk version - ever There is no field for a second name, no CSV upload and no campaign mode, and there will not be. A tool that drafts one message to one named person about one specific role is outreach. The same tool pointed at a list is a spam engine, and the difference between them lives entirely in the interface. The message quality depends on this too. What makes a cold message get a reply is that it obviously could not have been sent to anybody else - one real result, one named role. That property is destroyed by scale, so building for scale would break the thing that makes it work. ## What this tool will not do It will not find recruiters for you. There is no contact database here, no email lookup and no scraping. You bring the person; the tool writes the message. It will not exaggerate your background. Everything the message says about you comes from the couple of lines you write or from your profile resume, and where there is nothing to say, the draft says less rather than more. It will not send anything. The output is text you read, edit and send yourself, from your own account, which is also the only version of this that is honest. ## Questions people ask ### Is the recipient's name sent to an AI provider? No. The draft is generated against a [RECIPIENT] placeholder, and the real name is substituted back in on our own servers after the response returns. The person you are writing to is a named third party who has not consented to anything being sent to a model outside India, so forwarding their name while redacting yours would be a strange kind of privacy. ### Can I generate messages for a list of recruiters? No, and this will not change. There is one recipient field, no upload and no campaign mode. A tool that writes one message to one named person about one specific role is outreach; the same tool pointed at a list is a spam engine, and the difference is entirely in the interface. It would also make the output worse, because what earns a reply is that the message obviously could not have been sent to anyone else. ### Why does the LinkedIn note have a character limit? Because LinkedIn does. Connection notes are capped at 300 characters, so a longer draft would simply be rejected by the site you are pasting it into. We count the draft after the recipient's name goes back in, and ask for a shorter one if it overruns; if a draft is still over after that, the count turns red and tells you rather than cutting a sentence in half on your behalf. The limit is a useful constraint anyway: 300 characters has room for exactly one specific fact and one clear ask, which is what a good cold note contains. ### What should I put in the background field? One or two specific things you have done, not a summary of your career. "Six years on payment systems, rebuilt a settlement service and cut the nightly batch from four hours to forty minutes" is far more useful than "experienced backend engineer with a passion for scalable systems". Everything the message claims about you is drawn from this, so specificity here is what makes the draft worth sending. ### Will the message look automated? That depends mostly on your input, which is the honest answer. The draft avoids the usual tells - it does not open by praising the company, and it does not describe you in adjectives. But a message built from a vague background will read as vague. Give it one real result and it will produce something that could only have been sent by you.