# The eight dimensions

> Your readiness score is built from eight separate judgements. What each one is actually looking at, and which are within quick reach.

Source: https://www.revquix.com/docs/resume/the-eight-dimensions
Last verified: 2026-09-03

---

The AI Resume Analyser does not produce one opinion. It scores **eight dimensions** separately, and
your score is those eight combined - see [how your score is calculated](https://www.revquix.com/docs/resume/how-your-score-is-calculated).

Knowing which dimension a finding came from is what tells you whether it is a five-minute fix or a
rewrite.

## Parseability

Whether an applicant tracking system can read your file at all - layout, fonts, encryption, and
whether your contact details are in the text flow rather than a header.

⚠ This one can **cap your entire score**. Nothing else matters if the file cannot be read. See [the ATS check](https://www.revquix.com/docs/resume/the-ats-check), which tests the same thing for
free once a day.

## Structure and completeness

Whether the sections a recruiter and a parser both expect are present, complete, and in a
conventional order.

Usually the fastest dimension to improve - it is about what exists, not how well it is written.

## Impact and quantification

Whether your bullets state outcomes with numbers, or only describe duties.

This is where most resumes lose the most, and where the work is real writing rather than
rearranging. [Writing good bullets](https://www.revquix.com/docs/resume/writing-good-bullets)
covers it.

## Skill coverage

Whether the skills you claim are backed by a bullet that demonstrates them.

> **Warning** - Matched by meaning, not by keyword
>
> A skill can be listed in your resume and still count as unevidenced. Adding "Kubernetes" to a skills
> list does nothing for this dimension; a bullet describing what you did with it does. This is the
> dimension keyword-stuffing cannot move.

## Timeline integrity

Whether your dates are consistent, in order, and free of unexplained gaps.

Mostly mechanical, and worth fixing precisely because a reader assumes the worst about a gap you
have not explained.

## Language hygiene

Spelling, passive voice, clichés, first-person pronouns, bullet length - the things that make a
resume read as filler.

Low weight, high ease. Rarely the reason you were rejected; often the reason you were not taken
seriously.

## Career trajectory and scope

Whether your resume shows a career going somewhere - progression, tenure that holds, and the size of
what you have owned.

Its weight rises sharply with experience. On a fresher's resume it is a small check; on a
leadership resume it is joint-heaviest.

## Screening risk

Things that get a resume filtered or discounted for reasons that have nothing to do with how good
you are - liabilities, ambiguities and unforced errors.

> **Note** - The cheapest points on the whole report
>
> Every item here is removable in one editing pass and removing it costs you nothing. A weak filename
> or "references available on request" is not a judgement about your ability - it is free score you
> are giving away.

- [How your score is calculated](https://www.revquix.com/docs/resume/how-your-score-is-calculated) - The weights, and why they change.

- [Reading your findings](https://www.revquix.com/docs/resume/reading-your-findings) - Which findings to act on first.
